Contact Us 619-589-8800


Some Animals are More Assistive than Others: HUD Issues New Guidelines regarding Disability Accommodation Requests Involving Assistance Animals

Posted by Steven Banks | Jun 01, 2020 | 0 Comments

It's been almost a decade since the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) last issued guidelines regarding assistance animals. Since then, use of assistance animals has increased considerably, as have efforts by some to exploit ambiguities, leading to news stories about emotional support peacocks and kangaroos. In the absence of clear guidance from HUD, HOAs have struggled with issues relating to accommodation requests involving assistive animals, such as the type and amount of documentation that can be required, particularly where a disability or a disability-related need for an animal isn't clear. The issue has been a fertile ground for complaints and lawsuits. In fact, HUD says almost 60% of federal Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) complaints concern denial of reasonable accommodations and disability access. Of those, complaints regarding denial of assistance animal requests are among the most commonly received by HUD and are “significantly” increasing.

Fortunately, HUD has recently issued new guidelines for service animals and assistance animals under the FHA, which replace HUD's prior 2013 guidelines. The new guidelines provide more clarity about acceptable assistance animals and about the application process through which requests for their use are reviewed. While the new guidelines do not modify present federal law or regulations, their use is “strongly” encouraged by HUD and will hopefully improve the application process for both applicants and HOAs. The new guidelines are broken into two sections: (1) “Assessing a Person's Request to Have an Animal as a Reasonable Accommodation Under the Fair Housing Act”; and (2) “Guidance on Documenting an Individual's Need for Assistance Animals in Housing.”

The first section primarily sets forth best practices regarding determining if the animal in question qualifies as a “service animal” under federal law or is otherwise a support animal or other type of assistance animal that needs to be accommodated. The guidelines provide an outline of acceptable inquiries of applicants, depending on whether disabilities are readily observable. Details are also provided regarding when and in what manner accommodation requests can be made. Of note is HUD's observation that in its experience, documentation (certificates, registrations, licensing documents, etc.) purchased from internet websites “is not, by itself, sufficient to reliably establish that an individual has a non-observable disability or disability-related need for an assistance animal.” The guidelines also differentiate between animals traditionally kept in households and “unique” animals. For approval of the latter, the requestor has the “substantial burden of demonstrating a disability-related therapeutic need for the specific animal or the specific type of animal.” The guidelines helpfully point out that “reptiles (other than turtles), barnyard animals, monkeys, kangaroos, and other non-domesticated animals are not considered common household animals.”

The second section is intended to help disabled individuals document their need for an assistance animal. This includes helping them explain to their health care professionals the type of information HOAs may need to evaluate their request, particularly when their disability or disability-related need for an accommodation is not readily observable. The section also notes that HOAs cannot require health care professionals to use a specific or notarized form, verify statements under penalty of perjury, or provide a diagnosis or other detailed information about the applicant.

Kriger Law Firm routinely assists its community association clients throughout Southern California on assistance animal issues. We encourage you to review the new HUD guidelines in detail. The new HUD guidelines are available online for download at:

About the Author

Steven Banks

Senior Associate Practice Areas: Community Association Counsel Construction Litigation Civil Litigation Steven Banks joined the firm in 2017 as a Senior Associate. Steve has been practicing law for over thirty years. Practicing primarily in litigation, his experience also includes homeowners as...


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.


Kriger Law Firm is committed to answering your questions about Community Association General Counsel, Governing Document Revisions, Alternative Dispute Resolution, CC & R Enforcement Litigation, and Common Interest Development law issues in California.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

The materials appearing on this website are provided for informational use only. They are in no way intended to constitute legal advice or the opinions of this law firm or any of its attorneys. You should not act or rely upon any information appearing on this website without seeking the advice of an attorney. Also, because the law is continually changing, the materials appearing on this website are not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or up-to-date.

Transmission and receipt of the information on the Kriger Law Firm website are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship, nor will the act of sending an e-mail to attorneys at Kriger Law Firm create an attorney-client relationship. Thus, we strongly advise against sending confidential or privileged information to us until you can establish such a relationship. Furthermore, we advise against sending privileged or confidential information through e-mail since we can in no way ensure the security of your e-mail.

Some jurisdictions would consider the materials appearing on this website to constitute advertising. The decision to hire a lawyer should not be based on the written information appearing on this website about the qualifications and experience of this firm and its members.

Links that may appear on this site are intended solely for your convenience in identifying and accessing other sources of information and are not to be construed as being endorsed by or affiliated with our office. Furthermore, Kriger Law Firm does not imply that it is legally authorized to use any trade name, registered trademark, symbol, logo, or seal that may be reflected in any of these links. Kriger Law Firm has sought to comply with all legal and ethical requirements in creating this website. Kriger Law Firm in no way seeks to use this website in any way as to represent anyone in a state where this site may fail to comply with the laws and ethical requirements of that state.